We retract the “Anons warn about insurection” video – It’s a fake

Greetings everyone,

Yesterday, we published this video “Anonymous warns about insurrection in America” and it turned out to be a fake.

First, we want to say we know telling the truth about this might make look us like idiots and make us lose credibility but since we promote truth, we will act as such.

How do we know it’s a fake?

The logo on the top left corner is in all the dude’s videos on his channel..
Video is only hosted on the dude’s channel and not on any known Anon channel.
The techniques used in this video are not usually used by the editor(s) we know.
The topic. Gun control, is not a topic Anonymous is known to cover.
Most anons agree it doesn’t feel like us.
It’s not related to any Operations and we always associate this kind of PR to specific operations.
We know a lot of anons and none was able to tell us who is the creator of this video.
Not one Anon acknowledges the creation of this video.

We made a mistake!

Our ‘About Us’ page says : Be a reliable source of information. And we failed here. We apologize.

Making a mistake is something that can happen, but instead of lying about it and hiding it, we honor our motto. We aim to be honest and accountable.

What we think about this

Our voice is a tool we created for the people to use.
This dude is free to create a fake anonymous video if he likes.

But we are not working on any such operations we do not endorse this video.
Regardless we agree or not here doesn’t matter.
Truth is what matters.

Our comment system is broken. If you can help please contact us.

94 Comments

  1. Anonymous

    January 18, 2013

    no, but the “loose credibility” bums me out.

    • Anonymous

      January 18, 2013

      MUH CREDIBILITY

    • Anonymous

      January 18, 2013

      You’ll get over it.

    • Anonymous

      January 26, 2013

      I will admit I am guilty of re-uploaded this vid to my YT, I have since made it known that this was not the work of Anonymous in the description.

      My thoughts: definitely a pretty well made video though :p

      • Sage

        January 27, 2013

        We also like it. And we agree to some points also. And anyway, we didn’t try to have it remove or hack the dude who made it because :
        Our voice is a tool we created for the people. And they can use it.

        The Collective just don’t endorse this video.

    • Anonymous

      January 28, 2013

      As an American, I’d like to point out that I even thought this was real; & applauded the effort & agree with the gist of the message. Grammar doesn’t have to be everyone’s strong point. To be honest, I’m dissapointed that it IS fake :(

      How do we know who’s Anon & who’s not?

      • Anonymous

        February 2, 2013

        Everyone who says they are Anonymous, is Anonymous. Anyone speaking on behalf of the “Collective”‘ is speaking on behalf of only themselves, and is no longer Anonymous. Has everyone forgotten what Anonymous actually is?

  2. Anonymous

    January 18, 2013

    nobody’s perfect! keep up the good work!

  3. Steve

    January 18, 2013

    That is really a shame because this video actually *gave* your cause credibility in the eyes of millions who stand against the approaching tyrannical government.

    • Anonymous

      January 21, 2013

      There is no approaching tyrannical government. Paranoia does not suit the hive.

      • Anonymous

        January 22, 2013

        You’re right about there not being an approaching tyrannical government, because the government is ALREADY tyrannical. More and more every day, the government tramples on the natural rights of its citizens. Rights that they do not have the authority to take away. Rights that, in fact, the government was originally intended to protect, and do nothing more.

        So first, those hungry for power steal the word liberal and start calling us conservative. Then they take the word conservative back to the old fuedal roots and start calling us anarchists. But now, when you talk to anarchists most of the time you get a confused philosophy that still relies on central authority, so they stole that word too. But they can’t steal anonymous.

        I was under the impression that Anonymous is a collective of people with no leaders, no authorities, and most importantly no names. Anyone is a part of Anonymous if they say they are, and the things which Anonymous “does” happen organically in reaction to a collective mindset. You can’t figure out who made that video? Guess why, because he/she’s anonymous, thats the point. If the author of this “We’re sorry” post is attempting to be an authority over the actions of Anonymous, then guess what, its no longer Anonymous. Someone should make a “we’re sorry” post for the “we’re sorry” post.

        Gun rights are a serious issue when governments become and/or are tyrannical. It takes guns away from peaceful people, but it doesn’t make guns magically dissapear. If a criminal wanted one, he could still get one. And the smartest criminals could get themselves into positions of power in government. They have all the guns, and apparently all the rights.

        So this is not a “fake” video. Its just a video. A video an anonymous person made. If thats not part of Anonymous, then Anonymous is no longer Anonymous.

        • Anonymous

          January 31, 2013

          Yep.

        • Anonymous

          February 17, 2013

          Agree

      • Anonymous

        January 26, 2013

        Excellent response. It’s a shame this paranoia is proliferating. Government workers and soldiers in general are US.

        Thank you, Anonymous for this retraction, because that video sure didn’t seem like you to anyone with intelligence.

        • Anonymous

          January 27, 2013

          Sounds like you’re under the illusion that Anonymous is a group with an inherent political agenda. You might want to cover up, your political bias is showing. This video is not “fake” and the people claiming it is do not speak for Anonymous, they speak for themselves and for their own political agenda. Can’t find out who made the video? Because they’re Anonymous, that’s the point. This video spoke out for the rights of the citizens, not for the rhetoric of any political party. But apparently what you are assuming Anonymous is and what the author of this “retraction” is assuming Anonymous is, is something completely contradicting to the nature of Anonymous itself, with leaders, authorities and names, that DOES speak for the rhetoric of a political party rather than for the rights of the citizens. Looks like Anonymous has been co-opted, but not really because the co-opters have no authority over anonymity.

    • Anonymous

      January 26, 2013

      Total BS

      • Anonymous

        January 26, 2013

        That’s total BS in reponse to the Paranoiacs.

  4. Anonymous

    January 18, 2013

    This disturbs me. I was really hoping that this was a real Anon video. I hoped anonymous could see that what rights we have left, are a result of the 2nd amendment. Anonymous says that people should not fear their government,and the government should feel the people. How could a government ever fear an unarmed populace? Broomsticks, and pitchforks are not enough. An army of citizens armed as such would be no match.

    • Anonymous

      January 18, 2013

      And an armed population versus smart bombs, drones and other such weapons is any better?

      Its one thing to say that bearing arms would make it a fair and qual battle…its another when the difference is vast. If you were to seriously challenge to take over the US government and they seriously tried to prevent it as in the days of old…the sheer technological capabilities of modern warfare makes a militia inconsequential.

      • Anonymous

        January 19, 2013

        Yes it is better. You are assuming that the majority of the military would follow orders and attack their friends and families. That would not be a likely scenario. Most members of the armed forces would refuse those orders, and turn on those that would dare ask them to kill their father, or brother. Also, the collateral damage caused by drones would not be accepted. The current drone attacks in other countries is sickening.
        I truly hope that a violent uprising is not necessary, and I am in no way calling for it. My point was simply that without guns, the violations of our rights would be much worse. Protests would be stopped with real bullets from the police instead of rubber bullets, and pepper spray.
        I prefer the peaceful protest, and the 2nd amendment allows for that.

        • Anonymous

          January 23, 2013

          we have had a civil war before. but i dont see it happening again. no matter how much i disagree with my fellow citizens, they are still my fellow citizens.

      • Anonymous

        January 20, 2013

        This would mean that the button pushers would be unleashing upon their own friends and family members.

        • Anonymous

          January 22, 2013

          the button pushers are sitting on the ground in a box somewhere.

      • Anonymous

        January 22, 2013

        You’re mistaken. Muslim fighters drove the Soviets out of Afghanistan with small arms and now the U.S. is bugging out too. Remember Viet Nam? Cuba? The fact is, Guerrilla warfare is very effective. They know this and that’s why they want to take the guns.

      • Anonymous

        January 23, 2013

        Cowards, look at any revolution in history. The people are always at a disadvantage. Our soldiers don’t want bloodshed especially at home. Id say there would be 50% military personel on the peoples side. I don’t encourage offensive aggression but do encourage aggressive defense. If a peaceful resolution can not be met than, other means must be necessary. It has been a century of tyranny! Enough is enough.

    • Anonymous

      January 19, 2013

      Hank and Bill with AR-15s are absolutely incapable of putting up a worth-wile fight against the US military. Keep your conspiracy theories to yourself.

      • Anonymous

        January 20, 2013

        They do not have to fight the military unless they choose to. Think of all major cities with their water and electric shutdown, Food supplies disrupted by infrastructure damage. Think Katrina or Sandy were bad imagine the same disruption Nation wide in every city over 40,000.

      • Anonymous

        January 23, 2013

        That isn’t a real argument. First of all, just because Hank and Bill might get run over by tanks, doesn’t mean that they don’t have the right to fight back against a tyrannical government. Taking away that right is actually a form of tyranny in the first place. Had these rights not been stripped over time, as it had been intended when the American government was originally created, then Hank and Bill’s well regulated militia might actually stand a fighting chance.

        But more importantly, you can’t possibly know if Hank and Bill might succeed in keeping a tyrannical government from oppressing them, even with just some AR-15s. There are far too many variables to be able to predict accurately. How does the tyranny take place? How effective is the tyrannical government in enacting its oppression? How many people will have removed their consent from the government by the time it becomes so obviously tyrannical that violence becomes a necessary solution? How many men would fight for a tyrannical government against fellow countrymen?

        Maybe the one variable you CAN control, whether or not Hank and Bill have AR-15s, is the one thing that keeps them from being killed or oppressed. It doesn’t matter if Hank and Bill ever have to fight the government in their lifetimes, they have the right to. And if decades or centuries down the line Hank and Bill Jr.s DO have to fight their government, then every single infringement on their rights in history becomes a variable.

      • Anonymous

        January 23, 2013

        You’re under the impression that “Hank and Bill” aren’t military veterans, trained as well as the military is. Guerrilla tactics have worked since the American Revolution. I point you to Iraq, AFghanistan and Viet Nam. A determined, dedicated force can take on and win against a superior fighting force

        • Anonymous

          February 10, 2013

          I’d also point out the French resistance under the german occupation in WWII. Germans had tanks too, and they were never able to squash the resistance.

  5. Anonymous

    January 18, 2013

    I agreed that it didn’t compare to other broadcasts, in nature and in style. Thank you for admitting your mistake it shows more credibility than just leaving it be.

  6. Anonymous

    January 18, 2013

    That’s better!

  7. Anonymous

    January 18, 2013

    Mistakes happen. Too acknowledge them, own them and promote the truth….respect

  8. Anonymous

    January 18, 2013

    If you didn’t post it, why are you (read: how would you) make a statement that you are retracting it? Doesn’t that action lend credibility to the notion that someone at Anon posted it?

    • Anonymous

      January 18, 2013

      They didn’t upload it but they did post links to it giving it Anon credibility.

  9. Anonymous

    January 18, 2013

    I don’t see how coming clean on your own honest mistakes could ever cause a drop in credibility. Any other option should’ve been paired with disbandment. Good move. <3

  10. Anonymous

    January 18, 2013

    Excellent that you immediately admitted and corrected the error. The video was completely out of character for anonymous and had me wondering wtf was going on. Mistakes happen but this one was repaired quickly and fully. Maybe be on the lookout for more bogus stuff?

  11. Anonymous

    January 18, 2013

    English is not an easy language,corrected spelling & grammar in your statement

    Yesterday, we published this video “Anonymous warns about insurrection in America” and it turned out to be a fake.

    First, we want to say we know telling the truth about this might make look us like idiots and make us lose credibility but since we promote truth, we will act as such.

    How do we know it’s a fake?

    -The logo on the top left corner is in all the dude’s videos on his channel.
    -Video is only hosted on the dude’s channel and not on any known Anon channel.
    -The techniques used in this video are not usually used by the editor(s) we know.
    -The topic. Gun control, is not a topic Anonymous is known to cover.
    -Most anons agree it doesn’t feel like us.
    -It’s not related to any Operations and we always associate this kind of PR to specific operations.
    -We know a lot of anons and none was able to tell us who is the creator of this video.
    -Not one Anon acknowledges the creation of this video.

    We made a mistake!

    Our ‘About Us’ page says : Be a reliable source of information. And we failed here. We apologize.

    Making a mistake is something that can happen, but instead of lying about it and hiding it, we honor our motto. We aim to be honest and accountable.

    • Sage

      January 19, 2013

      Thx lad! Corrected :)

  12. Anonymous

    January 18, 2013

    As long as anonymous sticks to our honesty, the bad rep because of this video should soon disapear. Mistakes happen, that much is obvious. I wonder why the kid posted it though…?

    • Sage

      January 19, 2013

      He’s wanted to send out his opinion using our voices :)

    • Anonymous

      January 20, 2013

      A very realistic explanation would be that he believed he spoke for Anonymous or a splinter cell group in Anonymous.
      It seems, however that most of what he did was alone, and while that’s not a problem, it would help for Anons to bounce ideas off of other Anons for better ideas.
      Anonymous is information.

  13. Anonymous

    January 18, 2013

    How it looks from the perspective of this Anonymous sympathizer.

    Despite being an arguably casual supporter of Anonymous, I found the graphic, absence of “Expect Us” notably absent. There were more obvious red flags that this was not produced by anyone connected with the party supporting Wikileaks, identification of Amanda Todd’s bully, Steubenville rapists, among others.

    While the content set out checklist of conditions to avoid prior to civilians taking violent action, and seeks to set a non-belligerent & legal tone (and accordingly refraining from the use of “Expect Us” is consistent with this approach). The presence of NRA argumentation style, questionable legal interpretation, entirely without statistical studies but instead use of anecdotes and even promoting the rantings of Alex Jones, indicates a somewhat fringe mentality.

    Anonymous is united only by values of justice, freedom of people and information together with a willingness to transgress the “laws” of those that would constrain us. Such an environment is intellectually as free as it gets as it is willing to contemplate stepping outside the law in connection with higher aims and it is an open question just what those higher aims might be. Skepticism being essential to your sifting of information to sort out the accurate from false must be your bread & butter. Accordingly, I am highly skeptical of Anonymous being an environment where fringe dwellers would thrive.

    For this reason I did not believe this was released by the Anonymous collective, whatever you call yourselves. At best, the individual may genuinely see themselves as Anonymous. However, given that Alex Jones is hostile to many of the causes of Anonymous (eg OWS) together with how a supporter of Anonymous could miss this – while this could indeed be the actions of a confused individual, I find the video too good (apart from my objections above) to be the output of such an individual.

    Accordingly I believe it to be the product of a group of Proto 2nd Ammendment Terrorists, indoctrinated by the NRA yet not operating under their own volition. My basis for the NRA not being involved is twofold: First, Occam’s Razor. Due to the amount of those supporting an individualist interpretation of the 2nd Amendment is large enough to for independent groups to form eventually like Amino Acids given enough primal soup, the right conditions & time. Secondly the Lawyer shown in James Yeager’s “Pack your bags #3″ video pretty much lays out how the NRA sees things. I suspect that Attorney was sent from the NRA. I urge those more familiar with the NRA to look into this and find out who this Attorney is.

    I forgive you,

    • Anonymous

      January 18, 2013

      Dammit no edit, feel free to edit the above post according to the following errata:

      Paragraph 2

      Despite being an arguably casual supporter of Anonymous, I found the *different* graphic, absence of “Expect Us” notably absent.

      Paragraph 4:

      (Run on sentence needs some work)

      “Such an environment is intellectually as free as it gets as it is willing to contemplate stepping outside the law in connection with higher aims and it is an open question just what those higher aims might be.”

      Thanks for your time, Anonymous Moderator

      • Sage

        January 19, 2013

        Thanks for pointing out this stuff. We didn’T want to get more precise.
        That could have allow some other dude to make better fake anonymous vids ;)

        We have to moderate all comments since we destroy ips and personnal infos our spam filter aren’t working.

    • Anonymous

      January 22, 2013

      The second amendment doesn’t need interpretation. Self defense is an individual right. And the right to bear arms is fundemental.

  14. Anonymous

    January 18, 2013

    We understand to admit lie to protect the information given to us the “American” people. As well as the informer. Great job, I believe the constitution needs to be respected as it was written.

  15. Anonymous

    January 18, 2013

    I’m a supporter of the 2nd Amendment but I have to agree, it did not seem like Anonymous from what little I know. “Non-violent” resistance being at the core of Anonymous I understand why I have not seen more videos about it. Even in defense you can’t escape the fact that defense with a firearms is inherently violent regardless of how necessary it is sometime. I have to at least thank you for indirectly supporting the 2nd Amendment and the freedoms it helps safe guard (for the time being) against government tyranny. No credibility lost.

  16. Anonymous

    January 18, 2013

    Integrity, – Pretty rare these days. Nice one.

  17. Anonymous

    January 18, 2013

    And it’s facts didn’t really make a strong point.
    Here’s a simple way to determine if a video about “anon” activities is real or not. It would be supported by a known “anon” and if it has a symbol like that one did, it would be linked to a known anon. meaning they have a proven track record in anonymous activities. If you remember that was recommended after many were duped once before.
    This one tricked me too, but until I slept on it, I realized he is not an anon, He might be an activist with anonymous, but he has no hactivism acts that are known, therefor he is not an anon hactivist.
    Pretty sure that’s a good way to figure these things out.

  18. Anonymous

    January 18, 2013

    I always thought, everyone can be anonymous. Or was it only said so? I mean It’s good you said it’s not official. But has it to be bad because of that?

    • Sage

      January 19, 2013

      Everyone can be anonymous but this guy is not. He just posted a vid claiming he his. But know one know him and he didn’t speak about his intent or ally with anyone within the group we know.
      By now if this was from an anonymous they would have kicked our ass to the ground for claiming it’s not from them, we’re still alive :)

  19. Anonymous in NJ

    January 18, 2013

    Thank goodness. I was really freaked out that you would take such a position on gun control. Thank you for being honest about fake video post…we are all vulnerable.

    • Anonymous

      January 22, 2013

      Gun control is tyranny.

  20. Anonymous

    January 18, 2013

    Could it be a false flag by the gov’t, to try to promote insurrection — giving them the perfect excuse to crack down on all dissent, left, right and center?

    • Sage

      January 19, 2013

      The owner youtube channel is filled up with pro gun freak vid’s. It’s just some “crazy person”.

  21. Anonymous

    January 18, 2013

    .. or an excuse to round up Anonymous along with gun control resisters?

    • Sage

      January 19, 2013

      Believe what you will. We’ve always said the truth. You don’t have to believe us.

  22. Anonymous

    January 18, 2013

    If it wasn’t it should have been. We need people to stand up for all of our rights not just the ones that deal with www or freedom of open space. Our country is being divided over our 2nd amendment rights also the rights to free speech. This is now an Obamanation, and we are slaves to the 1%. I watch as my nephews and nieces have less and less to eat on their plates not for lack of work, nor the lack of trying, but because we cannot afford it with high taxes, insurance, and medical bills off the charts. If it wasn’t an Anon so be it, but the messenger had good intentions, and a good message was shared. No worries about credibility, you guys and gals have a way of proving everything you stand behind. :) good luck on future endeavors, and remember We the People are behind you all!

  23. cc

    January 18, 2013

    Thank you for clarifying this. I must be honest and say I was concerned when I saw this video as it seemed that you had taken a swerve in the wrong direction. Your protection of the innocent is something you should all be proud of and we are honored and proud of the work you have done so far. Thank You!!!

  24. Anonymous

    January 19, 2013

    hold on how can this be fake, when did Anon start being ‘official’ anyone can be anon so anyone can post a video, it doesn’t have to be from a recognised channel. Anonymous is a leaderless collective as soon as we begin to say vids arent real because its not on this channel we start down a slippery slope.

    • Anonymous

      January 19, 2013

      Hmm…you have a point there. I’ve followed everything I could 2nd Amendment and their are some good points in that video. Not pretty points…but good ones non the less.

    • Sage

      January 19, 2013

      It’s fake because the threat are empty and there is no action behind this video. No one in the collective as planned to take act for this.

  25. Anonymous

    January 19, 2013

    There are no official anon. Get over yourselves fags

  26. anonymouse

    January 19, 2013

    ..correct me if i am wrong but is not the leaderless hive tilled by the popularity of the announcement now if it is a direct violation of the principal of the philosophy anon

    Thank you for friendship anons

    • Sage

      January 19, 2013

      No it’s not. We validated with other anons everyone we ask agree that it’s fake.
      Also the YouTube is not an Anonymous channel it’s a pro-gun freak.

      • Anonymous

        January 22, 2013

        The constitution is pro-gun. Americans who are pro-gun are not “freaks.”

  27. Anonymous

    January 19, 2013

    Is anonymous willing to try help to protect all of our freedoms? It gave me a bit of comfort knowing of a secret entity which could fight government tyranny nonviolently. We must not let our second amendment be eroded. It’s no secret that “assault weapons” kill fewer annually than melee weapons. It has been said that it “should be a first step to broader gun control”.

  28. Tired and Anonymous

    January 19, 2013

    Anonymous acts to protect freedom of speech but also acts against hate speech (Westboro). Original Source of the Video appears extremely right wing and connected to assorted hate groups. ‘Knight of the Republic’ is more likely a reference to KKK than Star Wars. Maker is a believer in assorted conspiracy theories. His youtube site is mostly military grade weapon reviews…including one devoted to weapons for the coming ‘Zombie Apocalypse’. Seriously.

  29. Anonymous

    January 19, 2013

    Well I do not support anything of that sort, but I am a recently ETSed combat veteran who owns more than one assault rifle. I believe that our country is in danger. I hope that it can be resolved through non violent means, but I do agree with what was stated in the video. I may not agree with the person on other points, but we must defend all of our freedoms by whatever means necessary.

    • Anonymous

      January 22, 2013

      The government is out of control. The threat is real.

  30. Notabletoregister

    January 19, 2013

    I’m trying to register on hackersanonymous but after I do, I get redirected to the main page and when I try to log in nothing happens.

    • Sage

      January 19, 2013

      What is hackersanonymous? Do you have links or URLs?

      • Anonymous

        January 19, 2013

        12 step program for smokers?

  31. notabletoregister

    January 19, 2013

    • Sage

      January 19, 2013

      It look dead. Never heard about this website before so we can’t help you there. Good luck :p

  32. notabletoregister

    January 19, 2013

    Haha, my bad. http://www.anonymoushackers.org My brain is gone today.

  33. AnonCol

    January 20, 2013

    Some of the best documents ever written have errata. :-)

  34. Anonymous

    January 20, 2013

    >… we want to say we know telling the truth about this might make look us like idiots and make us lose credibility …

    You look like idiots and have no credibility regardless.

  35. Anonymous

    January 20, 2013

    @AnonRelations It seems that the version of the Anonymous responds to gun control video that you posted (with the logo in the top left corner) is just a mirrored version. The earliest uploaded version of the video that I could find on YouTube (uploaded Dec 16 2012) is this one here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dc69qZqG64w

    So, just saying, I still don’t know if this video is fake or real…

  36. Seamoremonster

    January 21, 2013

    Always takes guts to cut to the chase and admit it was a fuck up. Takes courage. I spent time today defending Anonymous…saying that it wasn’t your style. Thanks for proving me right, but more importantly thanks for all you do. You give an old fart like me hope in a world that seems to be rapidly going to shit.

  37. Nick

    January 21, 2013

    Impossible to have an impartial debate anywhere these days.
    If you don’t agree with something, you just get moderated out.

    Nice Anon, you don’t practice what you preach.

    • Sage

      January 21, 2013

      We moderate because we want to read all comments and also to filter fucking spam.

  38. Anonymous

    January 22, 2013

    While the vid did have a few good points, indeed it was not the style of Anonymous. While I aplaud the efforts of anon to bring out the truth, there is more then the 1st amendment that needs truth to be exposed for. NDAA violates the 4th amendment, obamacare, recent executive orders, etc – all clear legal violations. While I understand why Anon does not speak on these matters, I personally sometimes wish Anon would, even if it was to have a formal ‘nothing’ on these matters.

  39. Brucie

    January 22, 2013

    Hi, Guys!

  40. Lambchops

    January 23, 2013

    I do believe this even if you guys are taking back the statement. I just think it’s not Obama himself its the government period.

  41. Anonymous

    January 23, 2013

    Either you stand for all rights or you stand for nothing. There are some things worth living for but very few worth dying for. Stand now or kneel later. If you don’t act when your neighbor’s freedoms are violated don’t expect your neighbor to act when you are violated.

    • Anonymous

      January 26, 2013

      This is the best statement on the entire page.

  42. Anonymous

    February 1, 2013

    Anonymous needs to man the fuck up and take on real issues. This is one of those issues. When I think of anonymous, I think liberty. Or, at least I did. Who the fuck cares about an official anon. Retract this retraction and create a channel and an operation for this like you do for every other retarded thing. Liberty is more than free speech. Let this continue. Show support for all anon people. You are not special because you say official. This is an official anon sentiment. I am anonymous, here – alone if nothing else.

    • Sage

      February 1, 2013

      Yes you are right. This situation brought some debate in the group and we agreed that we would not do anything against this video either.
      There’s kindof a split opinion about this situation so we adopted a neutral “let it go” attitude after releasing this.

  43. Anonymous

    February 4, 2013

    Hey guys(gals) did something happen to my post?

  44. Anonymous

    February 4, 2013

    Character limit?

  45. Anonymous

    February 4, 2013

    Well i’ll make it short and sweet then. You hear talk about the” one percent”. Who the heck you think is really behind gun control?